Structured Access. Controlled Participation.

I — Engagement Model

Engagement Model Overview

AEJYS engagements are not initiated through self-service mechanisms. Access to the firm’s modeling infrastructure is granted following a structured review process in which the proposed engagement context is evaluated for suitability within the Alignment Architecture framework.

Each engagement proceeds through defined phases: request submission, eligibility review, structured intake, modeling execution, analyst review, and confidential delivery. The process is sequential and governed by institutional protocols at every stage.

The engagement model is designed to ensure that the firm’s modeling resources are applied to contexts where the structural characteristics of the proposed alliance warrant the level of analysis the framework provides. This is a threshold determination, not a commercial qualification.

II — Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

AEJYS is appropriate only when material financial, governance, or fiduciary exposure is under consideration.

The firm evaluates eligibility on the basis of exposure materiality. Alliances that involve one or more of the following characteristics are within scope:

• ▮Shared capital formation, equity exchange, or asset pooling above defined exposure thresholds
• ▮Co-governance arrangements involving fiduciary responsibility or authority transfer
• ▮Long-term financial interdependence with material exit cost
• ▮Institutional joint ventures or strategic mergers with operational integration
• ▮Any binding arrangement where the structural exposure warrants independent pre-commitment analysis

Contexts that do not involve material structural exposure are outside the scope of the firm’s modeling capability. Informal, low-exposure, or purely social relational contexts are not served by this framework and will be declined during eligibility review.

III — Controlled Access

Controlled Access Philosophy

Access to AEJYS is controlled by design. The firm does not maintain open enrollment, public registration, or unrestricted onboarding pathways. This posture is not a commercial strategy. It is a structural requirement of the modeling framework.

The Alignment Architecture produces meaningful output only when the input context carries sufficient material exposure to warrant the level of structural analysis the framework applies. Expanding access beyond this threshold would compromise the institutional credibility of the output.

Not all requests are accepted. Requests are reviewed for suitability against defined eligibility criteria. The review process is conducted confidentially, and the determination is communicated directly to the requesting party.

IV — Dual-Input Protocol

Dual-Input Participation Protocol

The Alignment Architecture framework supports two engagement configurations: dual-input and unilateral.

In a dual-input engagement, both parties to the proposed alliance submit structured inputs independently. Participation by the second party is voluntary. It is initiated through a secure, token-based invitation system and requires explicit consent before any data is submitted.

Mutual consent is required for the release of the completed assessment. Neither party may access the other party’s raw inputs. The delivered assessment reflects the modeled composite without disclosing individual response data.

Unilateral engagements — in which a single party submits structured inputs without the participation of the other party — are supported under a defined protocol. Unilateral assessments carry appropriate contextual constraints that are noted in the delivered output.

V — Confidentiality & Data Governance

Confidentiality & Data Governance

All engagement data is governed by institutional confidentiality standards from the point of submission through retention and eventual disposition.

Engagement records are not publicly searchable or externally accessible. Client identity is not disclosed to any party outside the defined engagement scope. Confidentiality obligations persist beyond the conclusion of the engagement.

VI — Access Status

Current Access Status

AEJYS is currently operating under a controlled-access engagement model. Assessment requests are accepted on a reviewed basis. Eligibility is determined through the structured review process described above.

The firm may, at its discretion, operate under invitation-only periods or limit the volume of concurrent engagements to maintain institutional quality standards. Access status is communicated directly to requesting parties and is not publicly disclosed in detail.

VII — Request Process

Structured Request Process

Engagement requests proceed through the following stages:

VIII — Non-Advisory Notice

Non-Advisory Posture & Limitation Acknowledgment

AEJYS does not provide advice. The firm does not recommend for or against any proposed alliance. The delivered assessment is a modeled structural output — not a directive, endorsement, or caution.

The assessment does not constitute legal, financial, therapeutic, or fiduciary counsel. Clients are expected to engage independent advisors for those functions. The output is intended as one input among many that parties may wish to consider in their decision-making process.

The modeling framework operates within defined constraints and inherent limitations. Input quality affects output quality. Self-reported data reflects the respondent’s declared position at the time of submission. The categorical output represents a modeled structural position, not an objective truth or a predictive claim.

Engagement with AEJYS constitutes acknowledgment of these limitations and the non-advisory nature of the output.